There is a hollow ache that sets in when someone we love leaves our life.
It is not merely absence but the haunting sense that something vital, some luminous fragment of the soul, has been torn away.
The body breathes, and the world continues, yet within, there is a strange silence - an echo where presence used to be.
Loss, however we experience it, fractures us.
It feels as though a thread connecting us to the deeper web of life has snapped.
We grieve not just for the other, but for the parts of ourselves that were interwoven with their presence - the facets of our spirit only they knew how to touch.
Grief whispers ancient truths, ones etched into myth and poetry across time.
In the myth of Persephone, her descent into the underworld mirrors the soul's journey through loss - a descent into darkness, a winter of the spirit.
But even there, life stirs.
The seasons turn.
Persephone returns, changed, but whole.
Grief transforms us, not by erasing the void but by asking us to learn how to carry it.
Psychology teaches us that grief is not a linear passage but a labyrinth of the heart.
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross described the stages of grief - denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance - not as neat steps but as waves that ebb and flow, often overlapping and returning when least expected.
John Bowlby, through attachment theory, helps us understand why loss feels so searing: our bonds with others are not incidental; they shape our sense of safety, identity, and belonging.
When those bonds rupture, we lose not only the other but also part of our foundation - a sense of who we are.
Object relations theory, proposed by Melanie Klein, says that when we lose someone, we don't only mourn their physical absence - we grieve the imprint they left on our psyche.
It can feel as though a mirror has shattered, leaving fragments of reflection that no longer form a coherent whole.
Yet, there is something profoundly human about this pain.
To love is to tether part of our essence to another being.
Martin Buber spoke of theI-Thou relationship, where in genuine connection, we do not merely experience the other as a separate entity but as part of our own existence.
When the other is gone, the 'I' feels destabilised, as though we have become untethered from the sacred exchange of presence.
How do we continue when a part of us feels absent?
It begins with honouring the void rather than resisting it.
To grieve is to bear witness to love in its rawest form.
A love that no longer has an object to touch, yet lingers as a sacred ache inside of you.
Continuing bonds theory suggests that healing does not require severing ties with the lost but rather finding new ways to keep them present. Ritual, memory, and art all become vessels and ways to give form to the formless ache.
This ache points to the paradox of human existence: we are both whole and fragmented.
We are shaped by the presence of others.
To lose someone is not to be broken but to be reshaped.
We remain whole, yet marked.
The cracks become part of our mosaic.
And so, we carry on.
Not because the void closes, but because we learn to live alongside it.
Grief becomes the shadowed companion that reminds us we have loved deeply, that we have risked connection in a world where nothing is guaranteed.
If you find yourself in that hollow space now, remember this: the missing piece was never truly separate from you. It was woven into your spirit, and though absence lingers...
love remains.
Speak their name.
Let the pain breathe.
And trust that in time, the ache will soften - not into forgetfulness but into a gentler presence, a quiet thread reminding you that love, even in loss, is never truly lost.